Executive Director
Team America PAC
Dear Mr. Epstein,
I want to thank you for all the good work you've been doing at Team America PAC to oppose the Sotomayor nomination. Your bosses, Tom Tancredo and Bay Buchanan, were among the first to call her a racist, and are currently among the last to let it go. Now, it's your turn.It's time Sotomayor was given a taste of your famous Epstein Street Treatment. You know what I mean: that thing where you expose "reverse-racists" by randomly accosting brown people on the sidewalk and giving them a karate chop as you shout the word "nigger" in a high-pitched Bruce-Lee-like shriek--just like you did according to this account from the US Attorney's office.
On July 7, 2007, at approximately 7:15 p.m. at Jefferson and M Street, Northwest, in Washington, D.C., defendant [Marcus Epstein] was walking down the street making offensive remarks when he encountered the complainant, Ms. [REDACTED], who is African-American. The defendant uttered, “Nigger,” as he delivered a karate chop to Ms. [REDACTED]’s head.You know Sotomayor would fold like a Limbaugh critic in Congress the moment you gave her the treatment. Hopefully, you'll get your chance before you're sentenced on July 8. If not, maybe you could videotape yourself delivering the treatment to some of your cellmates and send it to her. That may be enough.
Heterosexually yours,
Gen. JC Christian, patriot
I swear that the little, frightened white ninja that patrols my poop tubes just gave a shout-out to the GOP. Well, I think it was a shout-out. The braying had a brassy quality, that's for sure. There was a John Phillip Sousa effect, you're darn tootin'.
ReplyDelete++++
Here's a sure-fire way to see whether a minority is a reverse racist. Just get in their face and yell "Ni**er" or "Sp*c" or "C*nt" (Gen'l, I wish your software didn't have this French-ish politically correct censorship program. At least it also works on the word "H*nky" too.) If they get angry, especially if they try to punch you in the face, there's your proof!
ReplyDeleteSpeaking from personal experience, almost all of them are, particularly the ones who are bigger than I am. I have the bl*ck eyes to prove it!
(Hey, what's up with that last censorship?)
I'm not really big fan of censorship, one of the big reasons I went to blogs and the fact, that I often learned even more from the comments than I did from the originial post, no offense intended. When I explained to my wife what it was about (at least my perception) her comment was, "With the Generals language, he found that offensive?"
ReplyDeleteAnyway, I recently made a comment over at Bitchphd and the comment was deleted with the added caveat of a complete misrepresentation of what I had said, an accompaning slander (labeling me as dismissive of rape) and threatening to ban me if I ever did again what I didn't do. They could have saved the threat, I would never go back or waste my time commenting when what I really said could be deleted and misrepresented with an accompaning slander. I understand it is their blog and they can do what they want, but I would find it more easily swallowed if it was just deleted without the accompanying misrepresentation. If main stream media did that you could probably sue them not that I would want to get involved in our corrupt legal system or would reccomend it to anyone. I don't want to get involved with a blog that might do that to me, delete, OK, but substituting your interpretation for what I said, No. I hope you wouldn't do that, General. I don't think you did because your comment was obscure enough I couldn't characterize the offense. If I'm wrong I hope you'll say so because I don't really want to patronize censorship accompanied with misrepresentation, not that I'm saying you did misrepresent or slander just wanting a little clarification on the policy.
I find the whole Sotomayor thing to be kind of funny.
ReplyDeleteThe Hispanic community is largely family oriented and full of true believing Xians. You'd think they and the Republicans would get along famously.
But, no, they're brown so the GOP doesn't want 'em.
Sir, I think in this particular case, as Mr. Epstein will be taking on someone that is a lawyer and member of the bar he should consider a different tactic that might allow him to take on such a cunning foe. An Epstein-Bar(r)treatment if you will.
ReplyDeleteWhile I have no suggestions as to what this would entail I trust that Mr. Epstein, being the cunning tactician he is, is more than up to the task. His dedication is truely infectious and makes my heart swell just thinking about him. Actually, that may be my lymph nodes...
Knowdoubt, the rules here are you can't use the words of the oppressor (basically things like nigger, spic, faggot, cunt, dyke, etc). I use them only when they are a critical piece of the story as is the case here.
ReplyDeleteThis has been my policy from day one. You may not like it. A lot of people don't. But it's my blog and I can and will make commenting policies that will make it possible for me to read the comments without cringing.
You might think it is fine for the commenter to call a woman a "cunt." I don't, and I won't have it on my blog. If such a restriction is offensive to you, then don't come here. I'm not going to change it.
And as far as editing such comments, in the past, when I had haloscan, i would replace the word "cunt" with "[slur]" and add something like this at the end of the post "[patriotboy - The slurs of the oppressor "cunt, spic, faggot, nigger, etc are not allowed in my comments. I have made the changes marked by brackets to reflect that]
ReplyDeleteAnd, to avoid any confusion, the comment I deleted yesterday referred to a specific woman as being a "cunt." I know some people think that's ok, but I don't. It's misogynistic. And no, Anti, I don't give a fuck if you think otherwise.
I'm sorry if I sound testy, but I go through this every time I enforce that rule. I also end up getting a bunch of people who think they are committing a revolutionary act by breaking the rule. I have no patience for that.
ReplyDeleteGeneral Sir, You did sound just a tinney little bit testy there, but like you said it's your blog and a damn fine one if I may say so, myself. I've never used those words you mentioned although, I have said bit*h before, not to my wife but about somebody else. She forbade it, but she has loosened up a little, especially when I showed her the blog by the same name, is it on the list?
ReplyDeleteNo, I don't have a problem with those words espedially since they are not in my vocabulary, I suspected it was the misogeny, but couldn't be sure. Anyway, the thing I objected to was having a comment that I worked hard on deleted, then misrepresented. I never really needed anyone to tell me my rights about not coming if I don't like something, I've always been good about exercising those rights even if they weren't offered, but I do appreciate the consideration. I'm a big supporter of fairness, equality and all things good, just to be clear. Thanks for clearing things up and thanks for a great blog is anti a girl, just wondering?
Well, damn, that was supposed to say knowdoubt - I got my real identity confused with my online identity just to keep me from getting done in by one our more righteous brothers who might not like what I believe or not believe as the case maybe. Make that knowdoubt, not Tom. knowdoubt sounds better anyway.
ReplyDeleteSince we're on the subject I figured this was as good a time as any to announce that my detatchable penis has had a sex change and will henceforth be referred to as Slappy, the Happy Clam Flap.
ReplyDeleteAs you were.
++++
"You know Sotomayor would fold like a Republican Limbaugh critic in congress the moment you gave her the treatment."
ReplyDeleteFixed.
Jumpin' Jeezis Christ on a Giant Kangaroo! Here I try to make a funny about censorship using asterisks that I put in there myself (this worthy Christian website does not have any automatic word-bleeping program, as far as I know) and it apparently relates back to something that happened in reality? As real as things get on teh Internets tubez, that is. And I hadn't read any dispatches from the front for several days. Either I'm prescient, or I have the power to make things happen with the mighty power of my subconscious mind!
ReplyDeleteI'm going to the kitchen now to try and bend some spoons. But not the good pewter.
Tom/Knowdoubt, if I may speak up on behalf of the reknowned Annti, I would label her as half human, half Kentucky wildcat. She has a blog, but it's hard to read. I think she's a bit ADHD with the colour controls...
ReplyDeleteIt was me. I'm not sorry I typed it--I'd say that if anything it was more pleasant than I meant to be. I'm not upset that the General deleted it.
ReplyDeleteThe thing that brother knowdoubt speaks of happening over at that other website IS disturbing as that sort of act amounts to revisionism which is something we should not be doing as that is pretty much the reichwing's turf and they will be sending some guys named "bubba" and his brother "bubba" after us with lead pipes.
This Epstein gets in the slam and starts shooting off his face he may find out what it is to be dickchuked a few dozen times.
Well demmo, We have all sinned and come short of the glory, even deacons are allowed to slip now and then. The lack of remorse, hopefully that will come with time, glad to see you didn't loose your pew on the front row.
ReplyDeleteBukko, thanks for Annti's link, I get lost in kaleidoscopes so I didn't pay too much attention to reading just enjoyed.
ReplyDeleteDemo -- Teh Gen'l has censored YOU? But I thought you were, like, right there on the left hand of Gawd... One of the Inner Apostles, as it were.
ReplyDeleteI have been bleeped once, for a word that I made up, one that did not exist in nature. (Hint: it involved what Anne Coulter -- the real one, not the Anntichrist one -- said about John Edwards' hair.) It felt bad at first, but then it started feeling good, like ritual punishment by a dominatrix with a bamboo cane soaked in a woman's urine, when you're trussed up in a foetal position with latex thongs. Not that I'd know anything about that, of course.